Access = permit

I have got a bit of an issue with the “streets” within a religious complex which is only accessible through a security gate. in other words, random Striders can’t just wander in for a run to collect the nodes!

Way History: ‪Mahmood Avenue‬ (‪956640188‬) | OpenStreetMap is an example of the one of the roads.

At various times mappers have reset the access from private to “permit” which unfortunately CS seems to treat as publically accessible. Seeing these roads came through on the Waverley update today I reverted the access back to private https://citystrides.com/users/15017/cities/130975 but I both need to “wait” another month for them to disappear on CS and/or we may have the access being reset again.

Now permit says Tag:access=permit - OpenStreetMap Wiki and I can sort of see why mappers may use this tag as presume those wanting to go to the Mosque here will ask for permission to enter the site. That’s somewhat different to an area that is really accessible but you are advised to formally seek permission to use it. Either way I don’t think such streets should be on CS.

For reference here is the latest Street View of the security gate to enter here https://maps.app.goo.gl/f3xJpXhir5r5TR2c6

Hope you agree streets in such areas aren’t ones we should be including here.

I have “done” this city (well bar the odd “new” actual public ones that appears) but clearly I can’t really do these ones.

1 Like

I also encountered a huge police area which is all marked access=permit in OSM.

I agree that nodes in roads with access=permit should not be included in citystrides.

1 Like

Think a police complex should definitely be private. By and large I either think of a place/street as being private or not and clearly private if access is physically prevented at least some of the day.

Bringing this back up, since there wasn’t much feedback. I’m interesting in whether removing access=permit would affect others.

Without researching, it seems to me like permit-required places don’t really have a space in CityStrides.

2 Likes

Agreed access=permit implies that you might not be able to access something 24x7 without fear of not being “allowed”. That said I can’t really think of any such streets marked up as such where have run so far. One I thought of that has gates for cars but you can “openly” walk/run in despite private signs is marked as private on OSM as presume there is no “permit” to apply for. By and large for CS purposes I see access as binary - either you are allowed or you are not - e.g. by a normally locked gate. That’s not quite the same as on OSM but generally I either markup access as all or private as anything else just often seems a point of debate rather than fact. For instance access to some shops might be freely open until such time as they are shut and any gate towards them is locked. Permissive access to me might for things like beauty spots which may not be officially public spaces but in practice are accessible in daylight etc etc.

PS the streets in my first post that were marked as permissive I reclassified as private and “fortunately” nobody has yet reset them. But yes please remove any permissive only streets from CS.

1 Like

In OSM, access=permit may mean a lot of things: Tag:access=permit - OpenStreetMap Wiki

It’s rare (0.58%).

In the cases where the permit procedure is hard or impossible, it means one is blocked from completion in citystrides.

I completely second the idea of removing them, as private roads.

1 Like

Hi @JamesChevalier how can I help you to resolve this important issue? (it’s blocking me for achieving 100% of my home city :wink:)

Thanks!