# Adding date complete to city

**URL:** https://community.citystrides.com/t/adding-date-complete-to-city/23995
**Category:** Ideas
**Created:** [December 7, 2021, 11:41pm UTC](https://community.citystrides.com/t/adding-date-complete-to-city/23995 "2021-12-07T23:41:27Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Marty](https://community.citystrides.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/f0a364/32.png) [@Marty](https://community.citystrides.com/u/Marty)
#### Post date: [December 10, 2021, 1:27pm UTC](https://community.citystrides.com/t/adding-date-complete-to-city/23995/6 "2021-12-10T13:27:15Z")

</div>

> [@petje](#):
>
> it is the absolute truth that it is a 100% **at that moment in time in space**

That’s not entirely accurate. It’s 100% of the streets that meet the specific criteria to be ingested into CS. There could be a lot of streets that haven’t been created in OSM because there aren’t any local OSMers to add them. I’ve found streets on my runs that according to Google Street View have been there for ~7 years and they weren’t drawn in OSM at all or were missing street names. Or there could be streets that are in OSM but have a mislabeled type so they aren’t ingested into CS when some runners go by the street (ie they may skip it).

> [@petje](#):
>
> That would do right to the people who are first to complete

What about the instances James’ described in the other thread? Who should be labeled as “first to complete”?

> [@First, second, third, etc. city completion badge](https://community.citystrides.com/t/first-second-third-etc-city-completion-badge/21985/5):
>
> PersonA is present in CityStrides today & completes CityA tomorrow. PersonB joins CityStrides next week, but they completed CityA last month and 😱 didn’t know about CityStrides while they were doing it.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.citystrides.com/t/adding-date-complete-to-city/23995)._